Tentative November3 agenda only: seven individually listed precincts in six counties. Hertford separately says multiple precincts; its number is unspecified and is excluded, not zero. Additional precincts may be considered. Bars count named entries, not approved extensions, voters, delay or extra minutes. No new closing time established.
Read the values and scale as a table
Common zero; maximum magnitude 2 named precinct entries. November 3, 2026 tentative agenda. No extension approved by this notice; Hertford count unknown..
Wilson has two individually listed precincts; the other five charted counties have one each. Hertford is listed without a number. None of these marks means an extension is approved.
North Carolina emergency meeting notice posted November3; tentative named precincts and public access, with ordinary-hours guidance separately identified. Not an approved extension or results report.
Archive photograph · 2010-06-23 · Tabor City, North Carolina
Archive: Tabor City welcome arch, June23,2010. Pubdog / Wikimedia Commons, public domain.Tabor City is one locality named in the tentative agenda. This is a 2010 town scene, not its courthouse, a polling place, today’s conditions or evidence of an approved extension. Full original frame unchanged.Photo: Pubdog / Wikimedia Commons · Original source ↗ · Public domain ↗Original file unchanged; displayed at responsive sizes.
North Carolina’s election board called a 2 p.m. Eastern emergency meeting to consider voting-hour extensions. Its tentative agenda names seven precincts in six counties, plus unspecified precincts in Hertford. The notice does not approve extra time. Check the official notice and your assigned polling place; do not assume later hours. [1][9][8][2][3][4][5][6][7]
How we know11 scoped claims · 2 source recordsView evidence +
Each claim keeps its full assertion, date, source passage and limits. Source counts describe records, not independent corroboration.
1.Claim 1Supported
The November3 NCSBE notice schedules a remote emergency meeting at 2 p.m. North Carolina time (Eastern), or 1 p.m. Central, to consider extending voting hours.
Scope
North Carolina November3,2026 official tentative meeting agenda or separately identified ordinary-hours guidance only.
Evidence passage
Notice of Remote Emergency Meeting: remote meeting via Webex at 2 p.m. Tuesday November3; Tentative Agenda: Consideration of extension of voting hours.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Scheduled meeting, not a completed event; no extension is approved by this notice. Time zone follows Raleigh local time; EST is one hour ahead of CST on this date.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T18:42:18.383Z · North Carolina State Board of Elections
No reasons for a disruption, approved new closing times, affected voter totals, meeting outcome or election result established.
8.Claim 8Supported
The agenda separately lists Hertford County as multiple precincts without names or a numeric count; it says additional precincts may be considered as needed.
Scope
North Carolina November3,2026 official tentative meeting agenda or separately identified ordinary-hours guidance only.
Evidence passage
Tentative Agenda: County: Hertford / Multiple precincts; consideration parenthetical: additional precincts may be considered as needed.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Unknown is not zero. Hertford is excluded from numeric bars; the seven individually listed entries are not a statewide total.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T18:42:18.383Z · North Carolina State Board of Elections
No reasons for a disruption, approved new closing times, affected voter totals, meeting outcome or election result established.
10.Claim 10Supported
NCSBE general guidance states polls open 6:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m. on Election Day; voters in line at their assigned polling place at 7:30 p.m. can vote.
Scope
North Carolina November3,2026 official tentative meeting agenda or separately identified ordinary-hours guidance only.
Evidence passage
Overview of Election Day Voting, paragraphs1–2, including assigned polling place and in-line sentence.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
North Carolina local time, Eastern. Ordinary statewide guidance; a separately issued local extension may supersede a closing time. Do not assume a pending extension applies.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T18:42:18.383Z · North Carolina State Board of Elections
No reasons for a disruption, approved new closing times, affected voter totals, meeting outcome or election result established.
Still open: No operative extension decision, reason for any interruption, lost minutes or new closing time captured.
What remains unresolved
No operative extension decision, reason for any interruption, lost minutes or new closing time captured.
Hertford precinct names and count are unspecified; do not render that unknown as zero.
Meeting attendance, Webex playback and telephone connection untested.
No current rights-cleared polling photograph found; selected dated Tabor City archive is locality context only.
An official extension order, amended agenda or corrected precinct list requires immediate exact-source review and a retained revision. A schedule, crawler fingerprint or search excerpt cannot supply it.
SLF PAC file 2045891 only. Office-state subtotals of disbursements/obligations dated October 30 or November 1. Support and opposition combined. Not all race spending, actual paid amounts, contacts, votes or odds.
Read the values and scale as a table
Common zero; maximum magnitude 499425.1 U.S. dollars. One November 2,2026 F24; dissemination November 1.
Maine contains the largest reported amount in this packet; a common dollar scale compares disclosure amounts, not electoral strength.
SLF PAC file 2045891, November 2 disclosure: eight Senate messaging entries across six candidate-office states, all with November 1 dissemination labels. Not a roster, complete race-spending total or forecast.
Archive: U.S. Capitol; source metadata dates January 3, 2023. U.S. House of Representatives photograph.Institutional context only. The metadata date is retained; the exact shutter date is not independently established. Not a 2026 event, advertisement, PAC office or evidence of an expenditure. Full original JPEG unchanged.Photo: U.S. House of Representatives / Office of Congressman Robert Garcia / Wikimedia Commons · Original source ↗ · Public domain ↗Original file unchanged; displayed at responsive sizes.
SLF PAC’s November 2 filing reports $681,755.94 in eight Senate messaging entries. Maine accounts for $499,425.10, including a $484,000 media placement. These are one packet’s reported spending or obligations, not candidate income, delivered messages or votes. [2][3]
How we know12 scoped claims · 5 source recordsView evidence +
Each claim keeps its full assertion, date, source passage and limits. Source counts describe records, not independent corroboration.
1.Claim 1Supported
FEC file 2045891 is a new SLF PAC F24 received November 2 and listed most recent and unamended at this November 3 check.
Scope
SLF PAC file 2045891, November 2 disclosure: eight Senate messaging entries across six candidate-office states, all with November 1 dissemination labels. Not a roster, complete race-spending total or forecast.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T13:38:47.901Z · SLF PAC, C00571703, filed with the FEC
One bounded disclosure, not a census, candidate receipt, ballot roster or evidence of reach, persuasion, coordination or votes.
2.Claim 2Attributed
The four-page filing reports $681,755.94 across eight Senate general-election items. Every dissemination date is November 1; obligation/disbursement labels are October 30 or November 1.
Scope
SLF PAC file 2045891, November 2 disclosure: eight Senate messaging entries across six candidate-office states, all with November 1 dissemination labels. Not a roster, complete race-spending total or forecast.
Evidence passage
PDF pp1–4, SE.1–SE.8; amount fields22090.80,484000.00,15425.10,62194.20,24368.40,11970.90,56462.10,5244.44; p4 total681755.94. All eight office/election boxes inspected.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Reported disbursements or obligations only; not proof of payment, delivered contacts, audience, persuasion, candidate receipts or election outcome.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T13:38:47.901Z · SLF PAC, C00571703, filed with the FEC
One bounded disclosure, not a census, candidate receipt, ballot roster or evidence of reach, persuasion, coordination or votes.
3.The filing’s Maine candidate-office-state entries sum to $499,425.10.Attributed
The filing’s Maine candidate-office-state entries sum to $499,425.10.
Scope
SLF PAC file 2045891, November 2 disclosure: eight Senate messaging entries across six candidate-office states, all with November 1 dissemination labels. Not a roster, complete race-spending total or forecast.
Evidence passage
PDF pp1–2, SE.2 $484000 media placement + SE.3 $15425.10 phone calls. Sum amount fields once; exclude repeated calendar-year-to-date fields and vendor addresses.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Reported disbursements or obligations only; not proof of payment, delivered contacts, audience, persuasion, candidate receipts or election outcome.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T13:38:47.901Z · SLF PAC, C00571703, filed with the FEC
One bounded disclosure, not a census, candidate receipt, ballot roster or evidence of reach, persuasion, coordination or votes.
4.The filing’s Michigan candidate-office-state entries sum to $62,194.20.Attributed
The filing’s Michigan candidate-office-state entries sum to $62,194.20.
Scope
SLF PAC file 2045891, November 2 disclosure: eight Senate messaging entries across six candidate-office states, all with November 1 dissemination labels. Not a roster, complete race-spending total or forecast.
Evidence passage
PDF p2, SE.4 phone calls. Sum amount fields once; exclude repeated calendar-year-to-date fields and vendor addresses.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Reported disbursements or obligations only; not proof of payment, delivered contacts, audience, persuasion, candidate receipts or election outcome.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T13:38:47.901Z · SLF PAC, C00571703, filed with the FEC
One bounded disclosure, not a census, candidate receipt, ballot roster or evidence of reach, persuasion, coordination or votes.
5.The filing’s Ohio candidate-office-state entries sum to $61,706.54.Attributed
The filing’s Ohio candidate-office-state entries sum to $61,706.54.
Scope
SLF PAC file 2045891, November 2 disclosure: eight Senate messaging entries across six candidate-office states, all with November 1 dissemination labels. Not a roster, complete race-spending total or forecast.
Evidence passage
PDF p4, SE.7 $56462.10 phone calls + SE.8 $5244.44 text messaging. Sum amount fields once; exclude repeated calendar-year-to-date fields and vendor addresses.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Reported disbursements or obligations only; not proof of payment, delivered contacts, audience, persuasion, candidate receipts or election outcome.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T13:38:47.901Z · SLF PAC, C00571703, filed with the FEC
One bounded disclosure, not a census, candidate receipt, ballot roster or evidence of reach, persuasion, coordination or votes.
6.The filing’s Nebraska candidate-office-state entries sum to $24,368.40.Attributed
The filing’s Nebraska candidate-office-state entries sum to $24,368.40.
Scope
SLF PAC file 2045891, November 2 disclosure: eight Senate messaging entries across six candidate-office states, all with November 1 dissemination labels. Not a roster, complete race-spending total or forecast.
Evidence passage
PDF p3, SE.5 phone calls. Sum amount fields once; exclude repeated calendar-year-to-date fields and vendor addresses.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Reported disbursements or obligations only; not proof of payment, delivered contacts, audience, persuasion, candidate receipts or election outcome.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T13:38:47.901Z · SLF PAC, C00571703, filed with the FEC
One bounded disclosure, not a census, candidate receipt, ballot roster or evidence of reach, persuasion, coordination or votes.
7.The filing’s Alaska candidate-office-state entries sum to $22,090.80.Attributed
The filing’s Alaska candidate-office-state entries sum to $22,090.80.
Scope
SLF PAC file 2045891, November 2 disclosure: eight Senate messaging entries across six candidate-office states, all with November 1 dissemination labels. Not a roster, complete race-spending total or forecast.
Evidence passage
PDF p1, SE.1 phone calls. Sum amount fields once; exclude repeated calendar-year-to-date fields and vendor addresses.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Reported disbursements or obligations only; not proof of payment, delivered contacts, audience, persuasion, candidate receipts or election outcome.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T13:38:47.901Z · SLF PAC, C00571703, filed with the FEC
One bounded disclosure, not a census, candidate receipt, ballot roster or evidence of reach, persuasion, coordination or votes.
8.The filing’s New Hampshire candidate-office-state entries sum to $11,970.90.Attributed
The filing’s New Hampshire candidate-office-state entries sum to $11,970.90.
Scope
SLF PAC file 2045891, November 2 disclosure: eight Senate messaging entries across six candidate-office states, all with November 1 dissemination labels. Not a roster, complete race-spending total or forecast.
Evidence passage
PDF p3, SE.6 phone calls. Sum amount fields once; exclude repeated calendar-year-to-date fields and vendor addresses.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Reported disbursements or obligations only; not proof of payment, delivered contacts, audience, persuasion, candidate receipts or election outcome.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T13:38:47.901Z · SLF PAC, C00571703, filed with the FEC
One bounded disclosure, not a census, candidate receipt, ballot roster or evidence of reach, persuasion, coordination or votes.
9.Claim 9Attributed
The packet includes $484,000 in media placement, $192,511.50 in phone calls and $5,244.44 in text messaging.
Scope
SLF PAC file 2045891, November 2 disclosure: eight Senate messaging entries across six candidate-office states, all with November 1 dissemination labels. Not a roster, complete race-spending total or forecast.
Evidence passage
PDF SE.2 media placement484000; SE.1,3,4,5,6,7 PHONE CALLS sum192511.50; SE.8 TEXT MESSAGING5244.44. Media is opposition, phone/text items support; not electoral support quantities.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Reported disbursements or obligations only; not proof of payment, delivered contacts, audience, persuasion, candidate receipts or election outcome.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T13:38:47.901Z · SLF PAC, C00571703, filed with the FEC
One bounded disclosure, not a census, candidate receipt, ballot roster or evidence of reach, persuasion, coordination or votes.
10.The Senate helps write federal laws and confirms presidential nominees.Supported
The Senate helps write federal laws and confirms presidential nominees.
Scope
SLF PAC file 2045891, November 2 disclosure: eight Senate messaging entries across six candidate-office states, all with November 1 dissemination labels. Not a roster, complete race-spending total or forecast.
Evidence passage
USAGov Legislative branch and Executive branch nomination-and-confirmation sections.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
General institutional powers; no seat arithmetic, winner call or candidate policy assessment.
General federal explanation. It establishes no election outcome, bill text, candidate commitment, local voting deadline or independent cost estimate.
11.Claim 11Attributed
Independent expenditures are communications advocating election or defeat without coordination as defined by FEC rules; this filer certifies independence.
Scope
SLF PAC file 2045891, November 2 disclosure: eight Senate messaging entries across six candidate-office states, all with November 1 dissemination labels. Not a roster, complete race-spending total or forecast.
Evidence passage
FEC Making independent expenditures definition; PDF p4 signed independence certification.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
The certification is the committee’s assertion; this reporting has not independently investigated coordination.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T09:10:05.599Z · Federal Election Commission
Regulator’s explanation. A filed certification alone does not independently establish compliance or rule out coordination.
12.Claim 12Attributed
The earlier SLF PAC file 2045498 is a separate November 1 disclosure reporting $1,703,190.63 with October 31 dissemination labels; the new November 2 file is not its amendment.
Scope
The two identified SLF disclosures only; not a comprehensive committee total.
Evidence passage
Earlier PDF pp1–11, file 2045498, November 1, total1703190.63 and October 31 dissemination labels; new PDF pp1–4 file 2045891 November 2, new report box, November 1 dissemination; current metadata N/new, not amended.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Separate filed packets with distinct dissemination dates; no combined election, campaign or committee-spending total is calculated.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T09:01:43.752Z · SLF PAC, C00571703, filed with the FEC
Interested committee filing, not an audit. Reports disbursements or obligations, not candidate receipts, reach, persuasion or votes. Independence is the filer’s certification, not an investigation of coordination.
Still open: No invoices, message creative, payment confirmation, delivery logs or electoral-effect evidence were inspected.
What remains unresolved
No invoices, message creative, payment confirmation, delivery logs or electoral-effect evidence were inspected.
No candidate slate or policy comparison is presented; the chart uses filer-designated Senate office states.
The query has138 bounded results across two pages, not all campaign finance; this report totals one file.
A corrected or amended filing, contrary original expense record, or changed official record would require a retained revision and complete exact-source review.
Battleground New York file 2045893 only; five items for filer-designated NY-03, NY-17 and NY-21. Paid phones include a $22500 estimate whose obligation date is blank. Support and opposition combined; different methods are dollar categories, not comparable contact counts, unit costs or efficacy.
Read the values and scale as a table
Common zero; maximum magnitude 122500 U.S. dollars. One November 2,2026 F24; dissemination labels November 1–2.
Paid phones contain most of this packet’s reported dollars; the bars cannot show contacts, persuasion or cost-effectiveness.
Battleground New York file 2045893, received November 2: five House messaging items designated NY03, NY17 and NY21. One $22,500 item is an estimate; no complete candidate slate or race-spending census.
Archive photograph · 2018-08-19 · Sausalito, California
Archive: Democracy Action Marin phone/text-bank sign in Sausalito, California; source metadata dates August 19,2018. Fabrice Florin / Wikimedia Commons.Medium context from a different volunteer effort and election. Not New York, these vendors or this committee; not evidence of paid work, delivered contacts or 2026 activity. Full original JPEG unchanged.Photo: Fabrice Florin / Wikimedia Commons · Original source ↗ · CC BY-SA 2.0 ↗Original file unchanged; displayed at responsive sizes.
Battleground New York’s November 2 disclosure reports $158,529.84 across five House messaging items. Paid phones account for $122,500, including a $22,500 estimate. Canvassing and a billboard truck make up the rest. The filing does not verify completed contacts or persuasion. [2][3][4][5]
How we know8 scoped claims · 4 source recordsView evidence +
Each claim keeps its full assertion, date, source passage and limits. Source counts describe records, not independent corroboration.
1.Claim 1Supported
FEC file 2045893 is a new Battleground New York F24 received November 2 and listed most recent and unamended at the November 3 check.
Scope
Battleground New York file 2045893, received November 2: five House messaging items designated NY03, NY17 and NY21. One $22,500 item is an estimate; no complete candidate slate or race-spending census.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T13:38:47.897Z · Battleground New York, C00859355, filed with the FEC
One bounded disclosure, not a census, candidate receipt, ballot roster or evidence of reach, persuasion, coordination or votes.
2.Claim 2Attributed
The three-page filing reports $158,529.84 across five House general-election items designated New York districts 03, 17 and 21.
Scope
Battleground New York file 2045893, received November 2: five House messaging items designated NY03, NY17 and NY21. One $22,500 item is an estimate; no complete candidate slate or race-spending census.
Evidence passage
PDF pp1–3 transaction 500373800 $4029.84;500373786 $15000;500373790 $85000;500373848 $22500;500373787 $32000. Sum158529.84 matches p3 total. House/general and district boxes inspected.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Reported disbursements or obligations only; not proof of payment, delivered contacts, audience, persuasion, candidate receipts or election outcome.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T13:38:47.897Z · Battleground New York, C00859355, filed with the FEC
One bounded disclosure, not a census, candidate receipt, ballot roster or evidence of reach, persuasion, coordination or votes.
3.Three paid-phone entries total $122,500, including a $22,500 estimated cost for NY03.Attributed
Three paid-phone entries total $122,500, including a $22,500 estimated cost for NY03.
Scope
Battleground New York file 2045893, received November 2: five House messaging items designated NY03, NY17 and NY21. One $22,500 item is an estimate; no complete candidate slate or race-spending census.
Evidence passage
PDF p1 500373786 Paid Phones $15000 NY17; p2 500373790 Paid Phones $85000 NY21 and500373848 Paid Phones - Estimated Cost $22500 NY03. Last item has no filled disbursement/obligation date; not inferred.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Reported disbursements or obligations only; not proof of payment, delivered contacts, audience, persuasion, candidate receipts or election outcome.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T13:38:47.897Z · Battleground New York, C00859355, filed with the FEC
One bounded disclosure, not a census, candidate receipt, ballot roster or evidence of reach, persuasion, coordination or votes.
4.One canvassing entry reports $32,000 for NY17.Attributed
One canvassing entry reports $32,000 for NY17.
Scope
Battleground New York file 2045893, received November 2: five House messaging items designated NY03, NY17 and NY21. One $22,500 item is an estimate; no complete candidate slate or race-spending census.
Evidence passage
PDF p3 transaction 500373787, Voter Contact Organizing, Canvassing $32000, NY House17, support/general boxes.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Reported disbursements or obligations only; not proof of payment, delivered contacts, audience, persuasion, candidate receipts or election outcome.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T13:38:47.897Z · Battleground New York, C00859355, filed with the FEC
One bounded disclosure, not a census, candidate receipt, ballot roster or evidence of reach, persuasion, coordination or votes.
5.One LED billboard-truck advertising entry reports $4,029.84 for NY21.Attributed
One LED billboard-truck advertising entry reports $4,029.84 for NY21.
Scope
Battleground New York file 2045893, received November 2: five House messaging items designated NY03, NY17 and NY21. One $22,500 item is an estimate; no complete candidate slate or race-spending census.
Evidence passage
PDF p1 transaction 500373800, Marketing on Wheels LLC, LED Billboard Truck Advertising $4029.84, NY House21, opposition/general boxes.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Reported disbursements or obligations only; not proof of payment, delivered contacts, audience, persuasion, candidate receipts or election outcome.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T13:38:47.897Z · Battleground New York, C00859355, filed with the FEC
One bounded disclosure, not a census, candidate receipt, ballot roster or evidence of reach, persuasion, coordination or votes.
6.Claim 6Attributed
The filing’s dissemination labels are November 1 or2; filled disbursement/obligation dates are October 30 or November 2, with the estimated NY03 item’s date field blank.
Scope
Battleground New York file 2045893, received November 2: five House messaging items designated NY03, NY17 and NY21. One $22,500 item is an estimate; no complete candidate slate or race-spending census.
Evidence passage
PDF pp1–3:500373800 disseminatedNov2/obligatedOct30;500373786,500373790,500373787 disseminatedNov1/obligatedNov2;500373848 disseminatedNov2/obligation blank.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Filer-entered labels; a blank remains unknown. No actual delivery or posting time is verified.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T13:38:47.897Z · Battleground New York, C00859355, filed with the FEC
One bounded disclosure, not a census, candidate receipt, ballot roster or evidence of reach, persuasion, coordination or votes.
7.Claim 7Supported
The House is part of Congress, which writes federal laws; the president can veto legislation.
Scope
Battleground New York file 2045893, received November 2: five House messaging items designated NY03, NY17 and NY21. One $22,500 item is an estimate; no complete candidate slate or race-spending census.
Evidence passage
USAGov Legislative branch and Executive branch sections.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
General federal powers, not a promise that a candidate or majority can enact a policy alone.
General federal explanation. It establishes no election outcome, bill text, candidate commitment, local voting deadline or independent cost estimate.
8.Claim 8Attributed
Independent expenditures advocate a candidate’s election or defeat without coordination as defined by FEC rules; the filer certifies independence.
Scope
Battleground New York file 2045893, received November 2: five House messaging items designated NY03, NY17 and NY21. One $22,500 item is an estimate; no complete candidate slate or race-spending census.
Evidence passage
FEC independent-expenditure definition and PDF p3 signed certification.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
No independent investigation of coordination, donor motives, payment or delivery was conducted.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T09:10:05.599Z · Federal Election Commission
Regulator’s explanation. A filed certification alone does not independently establish compliance or rule out coordination.
Still open: The estimated NY03 phone cost and blank obligation date require a later original record to resolve.
What remains unresolved
The estimated NY03 phone cost and blank obligation date require a later original record to resolve.
No invoices, creative, payment confirmation, contact counts or electoral-effect evidence were inspected.
No current complete candidate roster is claimed. Districts and classifications are those in this filing, not independent ballot qualification.
A corrected or amended filing, contrary original expense record, or changed official record would require a retained revision and complete exact-source review.
Remainder of stated cumulative figure6802973.45 U.S. dollars [3]
Two nonoverlapping parts of $7,809,533.45. New item is explicitly estimated; remainder is subtraction, not an audit of prior entries. One committee, not total IA-03 money, candidate receipts, verified airtime or votes.
Read the values and scale as a table
Common zero; maximum magnitude 6802973.45 U.S. dollars. Parts of the filer’s stated 2026 cumulative figure, disclosed November 1.
The $1,006,560 estimate sits inside the stated cumulative figure; two message purposes do not make two buys.
Iowa House District 3 as designated in one Everytown Victory Fund November 1 disclosure; a TV-buy estimate, not a ballot guide, actual ad delivery or total race spending.
Archive photograph · 2011-08-15 · Brisbane Ekka, Australia
Archive: television studio camera displayed at Brisbane’s Ekka, Australia, August 15, 2011.Television-medium context only. Not Iowa, this ad, the payee’s equipment or proof of production, placement or delivery; unchanged full frame.Photo: NJM2010 / Wikimedia Commons · Original source ↗ · CC BY-SA 3.0 ↗Original file unchanged; displayed at responsive sizes.
Everytown Victory Fund’s November 1 filing reports a $1,006,560 estimated TV buy for Iowa’s 3rd House district. One expense references both support and opposition; it is not two separate million-dollar buys, campaign income or proof that viewers saw an ad. [1][2]
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY VICTORY FUND (EVERYTOWN VICTORY FUND) filed with the Federal Election Commission
Federal Election Commission
USAGov
How we know5 scoped claims · 3 source recordsView evidence +
Each claim keeps its full assertion, date, source passage and limits. Source counts describe records, not independent corroboration.
1.Claim 1Attributed
Everytown Victory Fund’s new November 1 report lists transaction 500005156, an estimated $1,006,560 TV ad buy payable to Waterfront Strategies Inc., with October 30 disbursement/obligation and October 31 dissemination dates.
Scope
Iowa House District 3 as designated in one Everytown Victory Fund November 1 disclosure; a TV-buy estimate, not a ballot guide, actual ad delivery or total race spending.
Evidence passage
Page 1: payee, amount, purpose, transaction ID and both date fields.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
The source explicitly calls this an estimated cost; payment, placement and delivery have not been independently verified.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T10:44:32.261Z · EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY VICTORY FUND (EVERYTOWN VICTORY FUND) filed with the Federal Election Commission
Disclosure is neither campaign income nor a census of race spending; no candidate qualification inferred.
2.Claim 2Attributed
The one item is marked support, House, Iowa district 03 and 2026 general; its purpose also references opposition to the other side. The report total is $1,006,560, not twice that amount.
Scope
Iowa House District 3 as designated in one Everytown Victory Fund November 1 disclosure; a TV-buy estimate, not a ballot guide, actual ad delivery or total race spending.
Evidence passage
Page 1: support/office/election checkboxes; purpose includes “Also Opposing”; single item, subtotal and total.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
This describes the filing’s classifications, not verified ad content, a cost allocation between candidates or ballot qualification.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T10:44:32.261Z · EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY VICTORY FUND (EVERYTOWN VICTORY FUND) filed with the Federal Election Commission
Disclosure is neither campaign income nor a census of race spending; no candidate qualification inferred.
3.Claim 3Supported
The stated $7,809,533.45 cumulative figure less the new $1,006,560 item equals $6,802,973.45; those two parts sum back to the stated cumulative figure.
Scope
Iowa House District 3 as designated in one Everytown Victory Fund November 1 disclosure; a TV-buy estimate, not a ballot guide, actual ad delivery or total race spending.
Evidence passage
Page 1: Calendar Year-To-Date Per Election field and the current item; arithmetic 7,809,533.45 − 1,006,560.00 = 6,802,973.45.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Subtraction only. Prior entries and the cumulative classification have not been independently audited; this is not total IA-03 race spending.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T10:44:32.261Z · EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY VICTORY FUND (EVERYTOWN VICTORY FUND) filed with the Federal Election Commission
Disclosure is neither campaign income nor a census of race spending; no candidate qualification inferred.
4.Claim 4Supported
The current FEC query identifies file 2045506 as a November 1 new F24, most_recent=true and is_amended=false.
Scope
Iowa House District 3 as designated in one Everytown Victory Fund November 1 disclosure; a TV-buy estimate, not a ballot guide, actual ad delivery or total race spending.
Evidence passage
Index results: file_number 2045506, committee_id C00688655, receipt_date, amendment_indicator, most_recent and is_amended fields.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Agency metadata at retrieval; a later amendment can change it. No timezone inferred from midnight API labels.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T13:37:27.878Z · Federal Election Commission
Disclosure is neither campaign income nor a census of race spending; no candidate qualification inferred.
5.Claim 5Supported
The House is part of Congress, which participates in federal lawmaking; the president can veto legislation.
Scope
Iowa House District 3 as designated in one Everytown Victory Fund November 1 disclosure; a TV-buy estimate, not a ballot guide, actual ad delivery or total race spending.
Evidence passage
USAGov Legislative branch and How each branch provides checks and balances.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Institutional context only; no prediction, majority arithmetic or legislative outcome.
General federal explanation. It establishes no election outcome, bill text, candidate commitment, local voting deadline or independent cost estimate.
Still open: A complete current IA-03 official ballot list was not verified for this expense report. It names no candidates and supplies no candidate-policy comparison.
What remains unresolved
A complete current IA-03 official ballot list was not verified for this expense report. It names no candidates and supplies no candidate-policy comparison.
Ad creative, invoices, actual payments, audience delivery, costs by message purpose and electoral effects are unverified.
Earlier entries behind the stated cumulative field are not audited.
A substantive amendment, corrected original record, or independently verified transaction/delivery evidence would reopen this report. No audience engagement or comprehension has been measured.
One fund, six items; support and opposition combined within each state. State is Senate office sought. Reported disbursements or obligations, not total race spending, delivered texts, public support or votes. Ohio is a special-general election.
Read the values and scale as a table
Common zero; maximum magnitude 309245.6 U.S. dollars. October 31, 2026 item dates; November 1 disclosure.
Texas has the largest reported cost in this one texting packet; the bars measure money, not audience or electoral effect.
One Digital Freedom Fund November 1 F24: six October 31 text-message items for Senate offices in Iowa, Ohio and Texas. Ohio is marked special-general; Iowa and Texas general. No complete spending census, candidate roster or message-delivery measure.
Archive photograph · 2015-10-22 · Location not established by inspected source metadata
Archive: a person uses WhatsApp on October 22, 2015.Context for phone messaging only. The pictured conversation is unrelated; no claim this fund used WhatsApp, this device or reached this person. Not a political message or a 2026 campaign scene; unchanged full frame.Photo: Helar Lukats / Wikimedia Commons · Original source ↗ · CC BY-SA 4.0 ↗Original file unchanged; displayed at responsive sizes.
Digital Freedom Fund’s November 1 filing reports $585,070.72 in six text-message items for Senate elections in Iowa, Ohio and Texas. Texas accounts for $309,245.60, Ohio $218,978.88 and Iowa $56,846.24. These are reported costs—not counts of texts, voters reached or votes won. [4][1][2][3]
DIGITAL FREEDOM FUND filed with the Federal Election Commission
Federal Election Commission
USAGov
How we know7 scoped claims · 3 source recordsView evidence +
Each claim keeps its full assertion, date, source passage and limits. Source counts describe records, not independent corroboration.
1.Claim 1Attributed
The filing’s two Iowa Senate text-message items are $39,969.74 and $16,876.50, totaling $56,846.24.
Scope
One Digital Freedom Fund November 1 F24: six October 31 text-message items for Senate offices in Iowa, Ohio and Texas. Ohio is marked special-general; Iowa and Texas general. No complete spending census, candidate roster or message-delivery measure.
Evidence passage
Page 1, SE.4367 and SE.4368, Senate/IA and general boxes, amount fields and page subtotal.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Committee-reported disbursements or obligations, not verified payments, number of messages, recipients or votes. State refers to the office sought, not the Florida vendor address.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T10:44:32.270Z · DIGITAL FREEDOM FUND filed with the Federal Election Commission
Disclosure is neither campaign income nor a census of race spending; no candidate qualification inferred.
2.Claim 2Attributed
The filing’s two Ohio Senate text-message items are $122,291.82 and $96,687.06, totaling $218,978.88, marked Special-General.
Scope
One Digital Freedom Fund November 1 F24: six October 31 text-message items for Senate offices in Iowa, Ohio and Texas. Ohio is marked special-general; Iowa and Texas general. No complete spending census, candidate roster or message-delivery measure.
Evidence passage
Page 2, SE.4369 and SE.4370, Senate/OH and Other: Special-General boxes, amount fields and subtotal.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Committee-reported disbursements or obligations, not verified payments, number of messages, recipients or votes. State refers to the office sought, not the Florida vendor address.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T10:44:32.270Z · DIGITAL FREEDOM FUND filed with the Federal Election Commission
Disclosure is neither campaign income nor a census of race spending; no candidate qualification inferred.
3.Claim 3Attributed
The filing’s two Texas Senate text-message items are $187,753.16 and $121,492.44, totaling $309,245.60.
Scope
One Digital Freedom Fund November 1 F24: six October 31 text-message items for Senate offices in Iowa, Ohio and Texas. Ohio is marked special-general; Iowa and Texas general. No complete spending census, candidate roster or message-delivery measure.
Evidence passage
Page 3, SE.4371 and SE.4372, Senate/TX and general boxes, amount fields and subtotal.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Committee-reported disbursements or obligations, not verified payments, number of messages, recipients or votes. State refers to the office sought, not the Florida vendor address.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T10:44:32.270Z · DIGITAL FREEDOM FUND filed with the Federal Election Commission
Disclosure is neither campaign income nor a census of race spending; no candidate qualification inferred.
4.Claim 4Supported
The six distinct text-message amounts sum to the filing’s $585,070.72 total; every row names Minute Mail Consulting Group LLC and dates dissemination and disbursement/obligation October 31.
Scope
One Digital Freedom Fund November 1 F24: six October 31 text-message items for Senate offices in Iowa, Ohio and Texas. Ohio is marked special-general; Iowa and Texas general. No complete spending census, candidate roster or message-delivery measure.
Evidence passage
Pages 1–3, SE.4367–SE.4372; final total. Sum 56,846.24 + 218,978.88 + 309,245.60 = 585,070.72.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Exact addition of reported item amounts only. Repeated cumulative fields are excluded; delivery, creative and underlying invoices are not inspected.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T10:44:32.270Z · DIGITAL FREEDOM FUND filed with the Federal Election Commission
Disclosure is neither campaign income nor a census of race spending; no candidate qualification inferred.
5.Claim 5Attributed
Each state pair contains one support and one opposition item; the committee certifies independence in its filing.
Scope
One Digital Freedom Fund November 1 F24: six October 31 text-message items for Senate offices in Iowa, Ohio and Texas. Ohio is marked special-general; Iowa and Texas general. No complete spending census, candidate roster or message-delivery measure.
Evidence passage
Pages 1–3: support/opposition boxes and perjury certification.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Classifications are the filer’s own. No independent coordination, ad-content or compliance investigation is established.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T10:44:32.270Z · DIGITAL FREEDOM FUND filed with the Federal Election Commission
Disclosure is neither campaign income nor a census of race spending; no candidate qualification inferred.
6.Claim 6Supported
The current FEC index lists file 2045547, committee C00911610, as a November 1 new F24, most_recent=true and is_amended=false.
Scope
One Digital Freedom Fund November 1 F24: six October 31 text-message items for Senate offices in Iowa, Ohio and Texas. Ohio is marked special-general; Iowa and Texas general. No complete spending census, candidate roster or message-delivery measure.
Evidence passage
Matching file_number 2045547 and committee_id C00911610; receipt_date, amendment_indicator, most_recent, is_amended.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Metadata at retrieval, not expense validation or a complete election-money census; no API timestamp timezone inferred.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T13:43:42.264Z · Federal Election Commission
Disclosure is neither campaign income nor a census of race spending; no candidate qualification inferred.
7.Claim 7Supported
The Senate participates in federal lawmaking and approves presidential Cabinet nominees, while a president can veto legislation.
Scope
One Digital Freedom Fund November 1 F24: six October 31 text-message items for Senate offices in Iowa, Ohio and Texas. Ohio is marked special-general; Iowa and Texas general. No complete spending census, candidate roster or message-delivery measure.
Evidence passage
USAGov Legislative branch, Executive branch Cabinet paragraph and checks and balances.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Institutional context, not a candidate forecast or assertion that one seat can enact a policy alone.
General federal explanation. It establishes no election outcome, bill text, candidate commitment, local voting deadline or independent cost estimate.
Still open: Complete official candidate lists and candidate-policy comparisons were not verified for this geographic expense summary; it names no candidates.
What remains unresolved
Complete official candidate lists and candidate-policy comparisons were not verified for this geographic expense summary; it names no candidates.
Message content, channel implementation, actual payments, delivery, unique recipients and effects are unverified. No inference that WhatsApp was used from contextual archive photography.
No independent donor, coordination or compliance investigation; committee filing is the originating expense source.
A substantive amendment, corrected original record, or independently verified transaction/delivery evidence would reopen this report. No audience engagement or comprehension has been measured.
Remainder of stated cumulative figure385771.68 U.S. dollars [3]
The two nonoverlapping parts sum to $498,771.68. Remainder is subtraction, not an audit of older entries. One committee and election only; not total VA-05 money, candidate income, people reached or votes.
Read the values and scale as a table
Common zero; maximum magnitude 385771.68 U.S. dollars. Parts of this filer’s stated 2026 cumulative figure, reported November 1.
The new $113,000 line is part of a cumulative figure; adding it again would double-count it.
Virginia’s 5th Congressional District voters; one outside committee’s reported message spending, distinct from the three printed candidate choices and from total race money.
Archive photograph · 2024-10-26 · Exact event location not established by inspected metadata; Virginia campaign context.
Archive: John McGuire (second from right) at a get-out-the-vote gathering with Glenn Youngkin and Jim Jordan, October 26, 2024.An older campaign identification scene, not the November 2026 texting effort or evidence of coordination. Source caption identifies the gathering; original frame unchanged.Photo: Glenn Youngkin / Spirit of Virginia / Wikimedia Commons · Original source ↗ · CC BY 2.0 ↗Original file unchanged; displayed at responsive sizes.
A new November 1 filing by Virginians for Conservative Leadership PAC reports $113,000 in texting supporting John McGuire. It is an outside committee’s stated disbursement or obligation, not money received by his campaign or evidence of votes. [1][5]
Virginians for Conservative Leadership PAC, C00960658
Federal Election Commission
Virginia Department of Elections
+1 more
How we know6 scoped claims · 5 source recordsView evidence +
Each claim keeps its full assertion, date, source passage and limits. Source counts describe records, not independent corroboration.
1.Claim 1Attributed
The November1 new F24 reports $113,000 for texting supporting John McGuire in Virginia’s 5th House district, payable to JLK Political Strategies; both listed transaction dates are November1.
Scope
The named original records and dates only; no measured audience or election outcome.
Evidence passage
Page1 SE.4175: new, 24-hour, support, House district05, VA and general-election checkboxes visually inspected; amount and both dates.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
A committee-reported disbursement or obligation, not a verified bank transfer, delivered-message count or candidate receipt.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T09:06:16.527Z · Virginians for Conservative Leadership PAC, C00960658, filed with the FEC
Interested committee filing, not an audit or proof of message delivery or electoral effect. Cumulative field is the filer’s own stated figure; underlying earlier filings are not audited here.
2.FEC metadata lists file2045471 as most recent and unamended at the November3 check.Supported
FEC metadata lists file2045471 as most recent and unamended at the November3 check.
Scope
The named original records and dates only; no measured audience or election outcome.
Evidence passage
FEC query result file_number2045471; amendment_indicatorN, is_amendedfalse, most_recenttrue.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Later amendments could change the record; current query is not a full finance census.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T13:43:42.264Z · Federal Election Commission
Administrative disclosure metadata, not independent verification of expenditures. Receipt dates are agency calendar labels; no event time zone is inferred from midnight timestamps. This query is not all campaign finance.
3.Claim 3Attributed
The same filing states a $498,771.68 calendar-year-to-date figure for the election; subtracting its $113,000 item leaves a $385,771.68 remainder.
Scope
The named original records and dates only; no measured audience or election outcome.
A decomposition of the filer’s stated cumulative field, not an independent audit of the earlier component. The parts must not be added to the cumulative figure again.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T09:06:16.527Z · Virginians for Conservative Leadership PAC, C00960658, filed with the FEC
Interested committee filing, not an audit or proof of message delivery or electoral effect. Cumulative field is the filer’s own stated figure; underlying earlier filings are not audited here.
4.Claim 4Supported
Virginia’s official November3 federal table lists Tom S. P. Perriello, John J. McGuire III and Cooke C. Harvey for the 5th House district.
Scope
The named original records and dates only; no measured audience or election outcome.
Evidence passage
2026 federal-offices table, all three 5th District rows: Democratic, Republican, Independent.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Printed choices only; no write-in completeness or candidate-policy positions inferred.
Retrieved 2026-11-03T09:06:16.527Z · Virginians for Conservative Leadership PAC, C00960658, filed with the FEC
Interested committee filing, not an audit or proof of message delivery or electoral effect. Cumulative field is the filer’s own stated figure; underlying earlier filings are not audited here.
General federal explanation. It establishes no election outcome, bill text, candidate commitment, local voting deadline or independent cost estimate.
Still open: No delivered-text count, reach, persuasion estimate, donor tracing or independent coordination investigation.
What remains unresolved
No delivered-text count, reach, persuasion estimate, donor tracing or independent coordination investigation.
Earlier components of the stated cumulative figure not independently audited.
Printed roster verified; qualified write-ins and candidate-policy comparison are outside this bounded money report.
A corrected original, amended filing, current contrary candidate answer, changed official roster or operative order would require a new retained version and complete exact-source review.
● = the county named above; House = House minority caucus. Arrows connect an institution to a county named in its announced plan; ? = not specified in this account, not absent. MPR’s November 2 account; as of November 3. Plans and named counties only, not attendance, current indoor-access permission, complete staffing or legal powers. Missing counties mean not specified here, not no observers.
Read the records as a table
Documented records; no implied sequence or shared numerical scale.
The announced House and DOJ footprints overlap in Hennepin but are not the same list.
Voters in Hennepin, Olmsted and Ramsey counties who need to distinguish announced observer roles from observed attendance, election authority or results.
Archive: Hennepin County Government Center, Minneapolis, May 20, 2018.County-government context only, not an Election Day polling scene, announced deployment site or evidence that any observer attended. Full original JPEG unchanged.Photo: McGhiever / Wikimedia Commons · Original source ↗ · CC BY-SA 4.0 ↗Original file unchanged; displayed at responsive sizes.
MPR’s November 2 report says state officials announced one House minority-caucus observer each for Hennepin and Olmsted counties, alongside separate DOJ monitoring plans naming Hennepin and Ramsey. These are attributed plans. Attendance and current permission to enter polling places have not been verified. [1][2]
One originating newsroom account of state officials. No direct House deployment notice, independent attendance check or new governing legal order captured. No finding of wrongdoing follows from observer plans.
2.Claim 2Attributed
MPR’s November 2 report attributes separate DOJ monitoring plans naming Hennepin and Ramsey counties to state election officials.
Scope
The named original records and dates only; no measured audience or election outcome.
Evidence passage
Opening paragraph distinguishing DOJ monitors from House minority-caucus observers.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Attributed plans only; no independently verified attendance, current indoor-access permission or new legal authority. October22 background cannot establish November3 permission.
One originating newsroom account of state officials. No direct House deployment notice, independent attendance check or new governing legal order captured. No finding of wrongdoing follows from observer plans.
3.MPR reported Simon said the House majority caucus had so far declined to send observers.Attributed
MPR reported Simon said the House majority caucus had so far declined to send observers.
Scope
The named original records and dates only; no measured audience or election outcome.
Evidence passage
Second paragraph, Simon’s publication-time statement about the majority caucus.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Attributed November2 status, not an independently confirmed current refusal, or evidence about the election’s integrity.
One originating newsroom account of state officials. No direct House deployment notice, independent attendance check or new governing legal order captured. No finding of wrongdoing follows from observer plans.
4.August indoor-access limits do not establish November permissionAttributed
In MPR’s October 22 interview, Simon said Hennepin and Ramsey had vetoed federal monitors’ entry inside polling places for August; he said he did not know whether they had decided for November.
Scope
October22 account of August and then-unknown November decisions, not present legal advice.
Evidence passage
October22 Q&A: What happened when federal observers were here for the August primary?; the answer distinguishes county veto of indoor presence from outside monitoring and explicitly says November decision unknown.
As of
2026-11-03
Limit
Older attributed context; not a current county access rule or confirmation of deployment.
Describes August and October22 understanding, not November3 access permission.
Still open: MPR is the originating interview report; no direct House deployment notice or separate DOJ notice captured.
What remains unresolved
MPR is the originating interview report; no direct House deployment notice or separate DOJ notice captured.
Actual attendance, full staffing, legal powers and Election Day outcomes not verified.
Reader-help page checked by unauthenticated HTTPS, but no voter identifier or personal data entered.
Current county-specific permission to enter polling places remains unverified. The October22 MPR interview describes August and is not today’s rule.
A corrected original, amended filing, current contrary candidate answer, changed official roster or operative order would require a new retained version and complete exact-source review.
This edition stays in the library.
Codex research assistant captured and inspected a new November3 NCSBE emergency-meeting notice absent from the live edition. Its 2 p.m. Eastern meeting will consider extensions at seven named precincts in six counties, plus unspecified Hertford precincts. The agenda is tentative and supplies no approved new closing time. Replace the older North Carolina briefing-access report and lead with the practical local consequence. Six retained stories preserve original reporting/evidence/photo bytes, with new required case identities and no inherited review. Seven meets the daily minimum; eight remains an unmet target without filler. All eight desks scanned. Connecticut and California source gaps, ten policy gaps and all results/source holds remain. Package is private; new complete exact-source review and publisher rendered/mobile/help/evidence/photo checks remain separate. No Daniel review, interviews or audience outcomes invented.
Material evidence changes produce dated revisions. Earlier editions and their release records remain available.
Publication & revision receipt
Seven election-only reports: lead with the fresh North Carolina tentative extension agenda and official help, retaining five substantive Senate/House campaign-finance reports and the distinct Minnesota observer announcement. No operative extension, completed meeting, result or winner claimed.
Released November 3, 2026 at 7:00 AM Central · Revision 3 · Updated November 3, 2026 at 1:54 PM Central
Published automatically under the editor’s standing direction. Individual human review is not implied. Educational examples are labeled; claims retain their source limits.
.jpg){kind=link}
